Preview

Bulletin of Vaganova Ballet Academy

Advanced search

The problem of representation: From the religious sign to the metalanguage of the visual

Abstract

The article explores the evolution of the concept of “representation” in the context of visual art. It examines various models of representation – from ancient mimesis to the semiotic conception articulated within structuralist and postmodernist theory. At the center of the study is Ernst Gombrich’s essay Meditations on a Hobby Horse, where representation is understood not as imitation of external appearance, but as functional substitution, comparable to religious and magical images that serve as standins. This perspective resonates with Carlo Ginzburg’s conception of representation as metonymic substitution in historical and cult practices. The article also draws a parallel with Ferdinand de Saussure’s theory of the sign and its further development in the works of Rosalind Krauss, who interprets collage as a metalanguage of the visual. As a result, representation appears not as a transparent mediator between image and reality, but as an autonomous structure subject to artistic and philosophical reflection. The article proposes to regard representation as a key tool for analyzing contemporary art.

About the Author

I. A. Kronchev
Russian Institute for the History of Arts; HSE Art and Design School
Russian Federation

Kronchev I. A. – Postgraduate Student at the Russian Institute for the History of Arts; Lec- turer, Department of Art History, HSE Art and Design School
5 Isaakiyevskaya Square, St. Petersburg, 190000
12 Malaya Pionerskaya St., Moscow, 115054



References

1. Чернышева М. А. Мимесис в изобразительном искусстве: От греческой классики до французского сюрреализма. СПб.: Санкт-Петербург. Ун-т, 2014. 382 с.

2. Ямпольский М. Б. Ткач и визионер: Очерки истории репрезентации, или О материальном и идеальном в культуре. М.: Новое литературное обозрение, 2007. 616 с.

3. Рыков А. В. Постмодернизм как «радикальный консерватизм»: Проблема художественно-теоретического консерватизма и американская теория современного искусства 1960‒1990-х гг. СПб.: Алетейя, 2007. 373 с.

4. Гинзбург К. Репрезентация: Слово, Идея, Вещь // Новое литературное обозрение. 1998. № 33/5. С. 5–21.

5. Гомбрих Э. История искусства. М.: Искусство-XXI век, 2013. 688 с.

6. Gombrich E. Meditations on a Hobby Horse or the Roots of Artistic Form // Meditations on a Hobby Horse: And Other Essays on the Theory of Art. London, New York: Phaidon, 1978. Р. 12–29.

7. Краусс Р. Во имя Пикассо // Подлинность авангарда и другие модернистские мифы. М.: Художественный журнал, 2003. 317 c.

8. Garcia T. In Defense of Representation // Realism Materialism Art. 2015. Р. 245‒251.

9. Андреева Е. Ю. Все и Ничто. Символические фигуры в искусстве второй половины XX века. СПб: Изд-во Ивана Лимбаха, 2011. 584 с.


Review

For citations:


Kronchev I.A. The problem of representation: From the religious sign to the metalanguage of the visual. Bulletin of Vaganova Ballet Academy. 2025;(4):101-109. (In Russ.)

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1681-8962 (Print)