Preview

Bulletin of Vaganova Ballet Academy

Advanced search

Musical composition: Problems of the text and semantic invariant

Abstract

The possibility to interpret musical compositions in multiple ways and, as a consequence, the existence of different ways of intoning (pronounce) the same composition (in other words, its semantic varying) raises the question of the limits of meaning of the given composition. There are various conditions of the existence of musical compositions: a) the conditions of the oral tradition, b) of the written one, in which the recording of the pitch and rhythmic aspects of a musical composition in their entirety has not yet been established, c) of the written tradition in full effect, not allowing additions to a composition by performers, d) of the written tradition, which reflected the musical realities of the 20th century. The wide coverage of the material assumes the use of the comparative historical method. In issues of generating of the musical meaning, it was most expedient to turn to the phenomenological-dialectical method. The author segregates the concepts of a textual and semantic invariants of a musical composition. Conclusions, which contain new provisions: a) as a semantic invariant of a composition is understood a sound image (model), which has a genre-style nature and determines all possible ways of intoning with the continuity of the oral performing tradition; b) in the music of the developed written tradition, the expansion of the range of interpretations is determined by the complex interweaving of various and even opposite genre models in a score, which, nevertheless, shaped the directions (vectors) of meanings, preventing the transition to “bad infinity.” (Refs. 15)

About the Author

K. V. Zenkin
Moscow State Tchaikovsky Conservatory
Russian Federation

Dr. Habil. (Arts); Prof., Vice Rector for Research Activities

13/6, Bolshaya Nikitskaya St., Moscow, 125009



References

1. Aranovskij M. G. Muzy`kal`ny`j tekst. Struktura i svojstva. M.: Kompozitor, 1998. 343 s.

2. Losev A. F. Dialektika xudozhestvennoj formy` // Losev A. F. Forma – Stil` – Vy`razhenie. M.: My`sl`, 1995. S. 5–296.

3. Shaxnazarova N. G. Muzy`ka Vostoka i muzy`ka Zapada: Tipy` muzy`kal`nogo professionalizma. M.: Sovetskij kompozitor, 1983. 153 s.

4. Magty`mguly`eva G. K. Problema individual`nogo i universal`nogo v turkmenskoj muzy`ke na primere narodnoj melodii «Nar agadzhi» // Muzy`ka – Filosofiya – Kul`tura. VIII mezhdunarodnaya mezhdisciplinarnaya nauchnaya konferenciya: Muzy`kal`naya nauka v istorii kul`tury`: filosofskie aspekty` i metodologicheskie osnovaniya, priurochennaya k 10-letiyu zhurnala «Nauchny`j vestnik Moskovskoj konservatorii» (23–25 dekabrya 2020 g.). M.: Nauch.-izdat. centr «Moskovskaya konservatoriya», 2020. S. 30–32.

5. Sokolova A. N. Zhanrovaya transformaciya v muzy`kal`nom fol`klore (na primere «Molitvy` Shamilya») // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iskusstvovedenie. 2019. № 1 (9). S. 30–45.

6. Saponov M. A. Iskusstvo improvizacii. M.: Muzy`ka, 1982. 77 s.

7. Barsova I. A. Ocherki po istorii partiturnoj notacii (XVI – pervaya polovina XVIII veka). M.: Mos. gos. konservatoriya, 1997. 571 s.

8. Panov A. A., Rozanov I. V. Performing Ornaments in English Virginal and Harpsichord Music (Based on the Study of Original Interpretation Instructions) // Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Iskusstvovedenie. 2020. № 1 (10). S. 41–67.

9. Mazel` L. A. Voprosy` analiza muzy`ki. M.: Sov. kompozitor, 1978. 352 s.

10. Asaf`ev B. V. Muzy`kal`naya forma kak process. L.: Muzgiz, 1971. 376 s.

11. Kirillina L.V. Klassicheskij stil` v muzy`ke XVIII – nachala XIX veka. M.: Moskovskaya gos. konservatoriya, 1996. Ch. 1. 192 s.

12. Kraft A., Kolodziej E., Debski P., Sniezek B., Cieslak A., Poroszewska M., Wierzbicka M., Klebba P., Miklaszewski K. Flash Time: How is Tempo Rubato Performed? The timing of sounds from bars 51 – 53 of Fryderyk Chopin’s Nocturne in D flat major, op. 27 No. 2, as recorded by pianists from various periods // Chopin 1810 – 2010. Ideas, Interpretations, Influence. Proceedings of the 3rd International Chopin Congress, Vol. 2, Warsaw/Poland, 2010 / ed. by I. Poniatowska, Z. Chechlinska, Warsaw: The Fryderyk Chopin Institute, 2017. P. 27–48.

13. Hansen M. S. Pedalling the Chopin Concertos: Chopin and the Style Brillante // Chopin 1810–2010. Ideas, Interpretations, Influence. Proceedings of the 3rd International Chopin Congress, Vol. 2, Warsaw/Poland, 2010 / ed. by I. Poniatowska, Z. Chechlinska, Warsaw: The Fryderyk Chopin Institute, 2017. P. 155–172.

14. Losev A. F. Muzy`ka kak predmet logiki // Losev A.F. Forma – Stil` – Vy`razhenie. M.: My`sl`, 1995. S. 405–602.

15. Lotman Yu. M. Kanonicheskoe iskusstvo kak informacionny`j paradoks // Lotman Yu.M. Stat`i po semiotike kul`tury` i iskusstva. SPb., Gumanitarnoe agentstvo «Akademicheskij proekt», 2002. S. 314–321.


Review

For citations:


Zenkin K.V. Musical composition: Problems of the text and semantic invariant. Bulletin of Vaganova Ballet Academy. 2021;(3):122-131. (In Russ.)

Views: 362


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1681-8962 (Print)